Hereditary, genetic… or transgenerational habits?
![]() |
| Every change in our environment and habits can nourish or weaken our body. Like this young sprout, our vitality flourishes when our vital relationships are correct 🌱 |
One of the
deepest and most widespread beliefs I encounter in my patients concerns the
family history of diseases.
When a doctor asks, “Do you have a family history of diabetes, hypertension,
cancer, asthma?”, the patient’s answer almost always carries an implicit
interpretation: if a disease appears across generations, it must be genetic.
And by “genetic,”
many understand: I was born with a defective gene, a ticking time bomb inside
me, and there’s nothing to do but wait for it to go off.
Consequences of this belief
- Persistent anxiety
When a disease has marked the family--heart attacks, strokes, dementia, cancer, repeated hysterectomies--the individual lives with the silent dread that “my turn will come.” They consult regularly, hoping that if the disease appears, it will be diagnosed and managed quickly. - Lack of curiosity
Since the explanation seems already given (“it’s in my genes”), no one asks why these diseases recur in the same lineage. People stop questioning the meaning of this repetition or what, in real life, favors the appearance of these symptoms. - Dependence
on the doctor
- Normalization
of symptom-focused medicine
Genetics:
what does it really mean?
For a
disease to be truly genetic, three precise conditions must be met:
- The gene involved is
identified.
- The nature of the alteration
(mutation, duplication, absence…) is known.
- There is a test to confirm or
refute this alteration.
In everyday
clinical practice, such cases are extremely rare:
- Trisomy 21: identified chromosome and
possible test
- Huntington’s
disease: exact gene identified
- BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: increased risk of certain
breast and ovarian cancers
- Some
cardiomyopathies: genes identified
And that’s essentially it. In most general practice offices or hospital departments, truly
genetic diseases can be counted on one hand.
Transgenerational ≠ Hereditary ≠ Genetic
- Transgenerational: what repeats across
generations in a family. An observation.
- Hereditary: what is biologically
transmitted through reproduction. A biological causality.
- Genetic: what relates to genes. A
precise molecular explanation.
What many
call “hereditary”--and equate with “genetic”--is often only a
transgenerational observation.
Despite extensive research in genetics and epigenetics, without a proven causal gene and confirmatory test, a disease should not be considered genetic or hereditary.
This
shortcut did not arise by chance. Around the discovery of DNA and the awarding
of the Nobel Prize, there was immense social and scientific pressure to explain
everything through genetics.
We were presented as humans programmed like machines, with “ticking bombs”
written into our genes.
The price
of this narrative:
- Normalization
of permanent medical anxiety
- Reinforcement of essentially
symptom-focused medicine
- Disappearance of attention to
lived life, habits, and above all, vital relationships
What if
it isn’t genetic?
The real
question becomes: what repeats, if not genes?
Some concrete examples:
- Certain families show
hysterectomies across multiple generations--for fibroids, endometriosis,
or other reasons. The medical causes differ, but the surgical act repeats
like a red thread.
- In other families, asthma,
hypertension, or dementia recur.
- In yet others, early heart
attacks, chronic digestive disorders, or severe migraines appear
regularly.
These
repetitions are not genetic inevitabilities: no gene was provided, no genetic
test proposed. These are transgenerational phenomena.
Attentive
medicine: listening to vital relationships
This is
precisely where attentive medicine finds its field.
Rather than stopping at the label “transgenerational,” the practitioner
sits with the patient--sometimes including multiple family members--and
explores:
- What changes preceded the onset
of symptoms?
- Which vital relationships
(food, air, water, rest, self-expression…) have become incorrect?
- Which habits, conscious or
unconscious, keep the body in these incorrect relationships?
Unlike
speculative genetic assumptions, we have indisputable evidence:
- We die if we do not eat, drink,
breathe, eliminate waste, or regulate our temperature.
- We also need to be loved--first
by ourselves, and at least in childhood by another.
The body
immediately signals when vital relationships become incorrect:
- Abdominal pain if we eat “wood
instead of an apple”
- Cough
at the first cigarette
We also
have very tangible physiological evidence of our psychosomatic nature:
- Facial flushing when we feel
shame
- Salivation at the thought of a
lemon
- Sexual thoughts triggering
physiological responses in sexual organs
The body
does not pretend: it speaks. Provided we listen.
Conclusion
Until
someone shows me the gene, the alteration, and the test, considering a disease
genetic is not evidence-based--it’s a belief.
And this is good news.
It restores
the essential question: why did the body change at that moment and in that way?
Rather than
surrendering to the fear of an imaginary genetic bomb, we can regain curiosity
and attention to understand the life we lead, the habits we carry, and the
relationships we maintain--with ourselves, our loved ones, and our vital
environment--and above all, the why behind these states in our
relationships.
This is where attentive medicine opens new paths and can dismantle a powerful myth: transgenerational ≠ genetic.

Comments
Post a Comment